Atlas home || Conferences | Abstracts | about Atlas

International Conference on Modern Algebra in conjunction with the 17th annual Shanks Lectures
May 21-24, 2002
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, TN, USA

Organizers
Jonathan Farley, Ralph Freese, Matthew Gould, Peter Jipsen, George McNulty, Miklos Maroti, Alexander Ol'shanskii, Steven Tschantz, Constantine Tsinakis, Matthew Valeriote

View Abstracts
Conference Homepage

On a representation of posets by subsets
by
Branimir Seselja
Institute of Mathematics, University of Novi Sad, Yugoslavia

For an arbitrary poset P and its nonempty subset Q, consider the following collection of subsets of P:

P(Q):={ \uparrow p \cap Q | p in P}.

Such collections often appear in the framework of various set representations of poset. Usually, Q is the collection of particular (e.g., irreducible) elements of P, and instead of the principal filter, the corresponding ideal may appear. If this collection is ordered by inclusion, then f:p --> \uparrow p \cap Q is an anti-isotone map from P onto P(Q). This map may be a dual order isomorphism depending on properties of the subset Q and of general preoperties of P.

We give conditions under which f is a dual isomorphism, in some particular, and also in general case.

We also present some applications of the foregoing concept in representation of posets and in lattice valued (fuzzy) structures.

Let S be a nonempty set and (P, <= ) a poset. Consider a map f:S --> P, and for every p in P the set fp subset or equal S defined by

x in fp if and only if f(x) >= p.

The collection FP:={ fp | p in P} can be ordered by inclusion and the following hold.

(T1)For every x in S

f(x) = \/ (p in P | x in fp(x)),

i.e., the least upper bound of the set {p in P | x in fp(x)} exists and is equal to f(x).

(T2) If p, q in P and p <= q, then fq subset or equal fp.

(T3) (i) \cup (fp | p in P) = S ;

(ii) for every x in S, \cap (fp | x in fp) in FP, i.e., the collection FP is a point closure system under inclusion. Let \approx be an equivalence relation on P, defined by: for p, q in P

p \approx q if and only if fp = fq.

For p in P, let [p] \approx :={ q in P | p \approx q}.

(T4) p \approx q if and only if \uparrow p \cap f(S) = \uparrow q \cap f(S).

On the collection of P/ \approx = { [p] \approx | p in P} of \approx -classes, define the relation   <= as follows:


[p] \approx <= [q] \approx if and only if \uparrow q \cap f(S) subset or equal \uparrow p \cap f(S). (1)

(T5) (i) If for x in S, f(x)=p, then p is the greatest element of the \approx -class to which it belongs.

(ii) The relation   <= , defined by (1) is an ordering on P/ \approx and also

[p] \approx <= [q] \approx    if and only if fq subset or equal fp.

(iii) The poset (P/ \approx , <= ) is dually isomorphic with the poset (FP, subset or equal ).

The converse of the above constructions also holds, i.e., point closure system on a set can be represented by a single function on its subset.

(T6) Let f:S --> L be a map from a nonempty set S to a lattice L. Then:

(a) The collection FL={fp | p in L } is closed under intersections and a lattice under set inclusion;

(b) for every x in S, f(x)= \/ [f(x)] \approx ;

(c) for any p, q in L, [p] \approx <= [q] \approx if and only if \/ [p] \approx <= \/ [q] \approx

(the order on the right is the one from L).

The above representation of posets by functions can be generalized in the following way.

Theorem Let (P, <= ) be a poset and Q subset or equal P. Then (P, <= ) is dually isomorphic to the collection { Q \cap \uparrow p | p in P} ordered by inclusion if and only if Q is inf-dense in P.

By using characteristic functions of subsets arising in the foregoing constructions, particular classes of binary block-codes can be presented by a single function or a set.

Date received: April 30, 2002


Copyright © 2002 by the author(s). The author(s) of this document and the organizers of the conference have granted their consent to include this abstract in Atlas Conferences Inc. Document # cajl-05.