Atlas home ||
Conferences |
Abstracts |
about Atlas
19th Annual Great Plains Operator Theory Symposium
May 26-30, 1999
Iowa State University
Ames, IA, USA |
|
Organizers Justin Peters, Yiu Tung Poon, Bruce Wagner
View Abstracts
Conference Homepage |
On Some Fascinating Algebras of Operators Constructed from Some 2×2 Matrices
by
Kenneth Driessel
Iowa State University
Coauthors: Irvin R. Hentzel (Iowa State University)
We work with matrices over the real numbers R. Consider the following
2 ×2 matrices:
|
I : = |
æ ç
è
|
|
|
ö ÷
ø
|
, E : = |
æ ç
è
|
|
|
ö ÷
ø
|
, Z : = |
æ ç
è
|
|
|
ö ÷
ø
|
. |
|
Note that the set { I, E, Z } is closed under multiplication.
Hence its span is an associative algebra (contained in the algebra of lower
2 ×2 matrices). Let n be a natural number. Consider the
Kronecker/tensor products with lenth n having the following form:
|
L(k) : = I \otimes... \otimesI \otimesZ \otimesE \otimes... \otimesE |
|
which are formed by a string of k I's (with k=0 and k=n possible),
followed by a Z, followed by a string of E's.
These L(k) generate an algebra Fn of operators on the tensor
product space R\otimesn : = R2 \otimes... \otimesR2.
The algebra Fn has dimension 2n (which is the same as the
dimension of the tensor product space on which the operators act).
Justin Peters suggested that we study these algebras.
He noted that there is an embedding from Fn into Fn+1.
We shall describe some of our results concerning these algebras.
In particular, we discovered that these algebras have an involution.
We shall also describe our work on the following optimization problem for such an
algebra: Maximize <x * y, x * y > subject to the
constraints <x, x > = <y, y > = 1.
Here we use x*y to denote the product and <x, y > to denote the usual
scalar product in
Date received: May 21, 1999
Copyright © 1999 by the author(s).
The author(s) of this document and the organizers of the conference
have granted their consent to include this abstract in
Atlas Conferences Inc.
Document # cacw-78.