Atlas home ||
Conferences |
Abstracts |
about Atlas
Analysis and Topology, Lviv - 2008
May 26 - June 7, 2008
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
Lviv, Ukraine |
|
Organizers M.Zarichnyi, O.Skaskiv, T.Banakh (Lviv University)
View Abstracts
Conference Homepage |
Constructing small subsets with a given packing index in Abelian groups
by
Nadia Lyaskovska
Ivan Franko Lviv National University
For a subset A of a group G, we consider the following two
cardinal numbers
|
indP(A)= |
sup
| {|S|:S ⊂ G is such that {xA}x ∈ S is disjoint} |
|
and
|
IndP(A)= |
sup
| {|S|:S ⊂ G is such that{xA}x ∈ S is almost disjoint}, |
|
called the
packing indexes of A in G.
Those packing indexes have sharp versions carrying a bit more
information about A:
|
ind+P(A)= |
sup
| {|S|+:S ⊂ G is such that {xA}x ∈ S is disjoint} |
|
and
|
Ind+P(A)= |
sup
| {|S|+:S ⊂ G is such that{xA}x ∈ S is almost disjoint}. |
|
It follows that indP(A)=sup{k:k < ind+P(A)}
and indP(A) ≤ IndP(A). The (sharp) packing indexes measure
the geometric smallness of a subset of a group. Subsets with small
packing index can be thought as large in a geometric sense.
Theorem 1 Let G be an infinite Abelian group and L ⊂ G be a subset
with IndP(L)=1. For a cadinal k ∈ [2, |G|+] the following conditions are equivalent:
1) there is a subset A ⊂ G with indP+(A)=k;
2) there is a subset A ⊂ L with ind+P(A)=Ind+P(A)=k;
3) if |G/[G]2| ≤ 2, then k ≠ 4 and if G=[G]3, then k ≠ 3.
Here [G]p={x ∈ G:xp=1} stands for the subgroup of elements of order p.
Observe that the equality IndP(L)=1 is equivalent to |L∩(g+L)|=|G| for all g ∈ G, which means that L is rather large
in a geometric sense. Still such a set L can be presented as
union of small sets.
Theorem 2 Each infinite group G contains two subsets
A, B ⊂ G such that indP+(A)=indP+(B)=|G|+ but IndP(A∪B)=1.
Date received: May 7, 2008
Copyright © 2008 by the author(s).
The author(s) of this document and the organizers of the conference
have granted their consent to include this abstract in
Atlas Conferences Inc.
Document # cawm-54.